Making Coffee Travel Relevant

by Kenneth Davids


The Challenge: Coffee buyers for roasting companies should be doing much less travel and much more cupping, quality control and customer education.

Kenneth Davids writes:

I guess my reservation with the challenge statement is the repetition of the “much” word. If the thrust of the challenge statement is to argue that coffee buyers should focus first and foremost on the actual character of the coffee they buy and sell and less on travel stories glamorizing a quest for perfect coffees, etc. then I would agree. This critique applies as well to the traditional, older-fashioned marketing apparatus for fine single-origin coffees, wherein imagery of samba dancers and giraffes seemed to figure more prominently in promotional materials than attempts to describe the character of the coffees and what made them taste that way.

One of the reasons I like the latest trend in promotion of high-end coffee is that it tends to focus on what made the coffee taste the way it does – botanical variety, growing elevation, processing method, etc. – rather than on tourist hype or giraffes. True, the affectionate accounts of growers and their families one runs across on websites and packages may come off as a little irrelevant to how the coffee tastes, but I’ll go with it in the spirit of fairness, because if the media can turn hysterical cooks and pretentious winemakers into heroes I don’t see why we shouldn’t try to do the same for our own friends and collaborators in producing countries. True too, the tendency to brand coffee farms or coops and for roasters to buy green coffee by these brands rather than by the actual character of the coffee offered for sale in a given crop year is a little distressing from the point of view of coffee quality and authenticity, but again, if executives in soft-drink company board rooms can try to brand their stuff I can’t see why coffee growers can’t make the same attempt.

Although that does take us back to the argument made in the challenge statement, which is that coffee buyers should focus on the cup in front of them in this time and space and crop year and not on hype, safari glamour, or even on genuine friendship and how great the ron Zacapa was that night in Huehuetenango.

But finally, I think a certain kind of serious coffee travel undertaken over the long run is probably essential for coffee buyers. This is the kind that happens during harvest, and is slow, thorough in its observation, and ultimately focused on a better understanding of the cup itself and the almost infinite number of variables, both natural and deliberate, that go into determining its character. It is not the kind of touring in which a group hits three farms or coops per day and its all “we pick only ripe cherries and they go in here and come out there and our coffee is the greatest in the world, and we treat our workers well, and now let’s have a great lunch up at the house.” It’s a process of observing what actually happens during processing and drying, and talking a lot with the people who actually make it happen, and then following up with systematically cupping the results. And if at all possible continuing to cup the results through subsequent years and the changes those years bring. To me, newer roasters should have such an education, and as the money and time come available should spend time witnessing all of the major variations on processing method and drying. In other words, rather than four trips to Central America it might be better to make one trip to witness wet-hulling in Sumatra and another to some large hi-tech farm in Brazil where they do three different processing methods and another to some farm or coop that does both traditional wet process and small-scale dry process; in Ethiopia, for example.

We in the fine coffee industry need to make these investigations ourselves with an open mind, because the traditional lore of the traditional coffee industry is out-of-date and useless and the empirical work of the scientists is necessarily narrow in focus and, it would seem, oblivious to subtle sensory variation in coffee, which is precisely where we, as students and teachers of fine coffee, need to focus our attention.

For another perspective on this challenge, click here to see how Kevin Knox responds

This entry was written by:Kenneth Davids and posted on Monday, July 11th, 2011 at 11:19 am and is filed under Coffee Business: Roasting and Retailing, Green Coffee Origins and Issues, Industry Issues and News, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


4 Responses to “Making Coffee Travel Relevant”

  1. Arjuna says:

    I totally recommend Organo gold. For quality, taste and health – http://mycapturepage.com/cp23.php?id=470

  2. {buy nuratrim|buy nuratrim uk|buy nuratrim us|curvatrim customer reviews|does nuratrim work|kim kardashian nuratrim|natural…

    [...]Making Coffee Travel Relevant « Coffee Review[...]…

  3. This makes me think of all the ways that coffee differs. There are so many things that contribute to how a certain blend of coffee tastes and smells. I do like the first comment that states that the greater appeal is the “atmospheric” commentary of the roaster and the “adventure” of doing everything that has been said in the article. It is very true. What goes into the interest of a cup seems to be more about the appearance of the cup. What the cup appears to be or what it appears to have gone through.

  4. It may be that the processes employed should be the focus of the roaster, but far more likely to appeal to the average buyer is the “atmospheric” commentary of that roaster recounting the “adventure” of doing all you’ve said. It must also be added that side issues such as “fair trade” and narratives about the grower themselves adds human interest to the “cup” as well as the process. In short, the reader will benefit by these things, and the actual educational process also forwarded.

Leave a Reply